Best practices

Child benefit design: the importance of refundable tax deductions

Child benefits appear to reduce child poverty and improve the situation of children and their families, both educationally and health-wise. The evidence also indicates that they have a positive (but small) effect on the birth rate. However, the way these benefits are designed is crucial when it comes to activating all their potential.



  • Geographical scope: OECD countries.

1. Context

In the sphere of family policy, recent years have seen an increase in policies geared towards particular groups (mostly low-income households), at the expense of universal policies (targeting the population as a whole). Increased use of tax instruments is also found.

2. Debate

As the extension of tax instruments is to some extent related to a reduction in direct child allowance, their use (and particularly their design) has direct consequences in redistributive terms and on the progressivity of the tax system. Nevertheless, two different approaches are observed that rest on conflicting logics:

  • Non-refundable tax benefits. These reduce the tax liability. Basically they favour medium and low-income households; however, households with no or very low income, which have no
    tax liabilities or a very light tax burden, hardly benefit from these deductions.

  • Refundable tax benefits. These also reduce taxes, but when the deduction is greater than the tax liability the difference is credited as a net allowance. Deductions for maternity or large families are examples of such benefits, which favour all households to which they are applied, regardless of income.

On the whole, concessions or reductions on taxable income are considered to be regressive, as they mostly favour higher-income individuals. In contrast, tax credits are neutral or moderately progressive, as they are of a more equitable nature, insofar as they tend to represent a larger percentage of the fiscal balance for lower-income individuals.

However, the impact of these tax instruments, from a redistributive viewpoint, is unclear and unforeseeable, as they are closely related to the rest of the characteristics of the tax system (rates, the possibility of filing tax returns jointly or individually, exempt bases), which makes their use as redistribution tools inadvisable. Nevertheless, the refundable nature of some of these deductions marks a radical change in their redistributive capacity. Refundable tax benefits are strongly progressive, independently of the setting in which they operate.

3. Conclusions

Although neither concessions nor deductions are particularly effective as redistribution tools, refundable tax credits targeting low-income households do perform this function. In this respect, several analyses of the system of family and child benefits and deductions in Spain highlight the weak redistributive capacity of these tax instruments. They are unable to exert a significant effect on the reduction of poverty, as a large part of the households that lie below the poverty threshold are exempt from filing an income tax return.



Subject areas

Related content


Gender inequality in paid and unpaid work after the pandemic

Following the pandemic, 30% of men and 33% of women with children who are minors have been working from home at least one day a week. According to this study, this could favour greater equality in relation to family responsibilities.


How do gender, experience and caseload affect judicial decisions on intimate-partner violence cases?

Are male and female judges equally likely to grant restraining orders in cases of gender-based violence? According to this study, gender alone is not a determining factor but it is a key factor, together with experience and caseload.


Do men live in wealthier households than women?

Does a gender gap exist in relation to household wealth? According to this study, the difference is more pronounced at advanced ages since, in old age, women have greater probabilities of being widowed and seeing their wealth limited.


The STEM field is failing to attract female talent

In Spain, only 16% of STEM professionals are women. We analyse this gender gap.


PhD qualifications by different branches of knowledge and by sex

While the participation of female PhD holders in Portugal is situated above the EU‑27 average in all fields of knowledge considered, in Spain the participation of female PhD holders is situated below the European average in the fields of art, humanities and social sciences.

You may also find interesting

Social welfare systems and inequality in Europe


Social welfare systems and inequality in Europe

Social Inclusion

Spain’s social protection system is less redistributive than those of other EU countries. What reforms could help reduce economic inequality in Spain?

Detection of workplace bullying and its negative impact on psychological well-being


Detection of workplace bullying and its negative impact on psychological well-being

Social Inclusion

11.2% of the population present a high probability of suffering a situation of harassment in their workplace and may develop generalised anxiety disorder. How can possible cases of psychological harassment be detected?

Technocratic attitudes in Spain during the pandemic


Technocratic attitudes in Spain during the pandemic

Social Inclusion

In times of crisis, do citizens prefer to adopt a more technical type of government? According to this study, technocratic attitudes among Spanish people increased during the pandemic, especially among right-wing voters.