Asset Publisher

Best practices

CURANT

Cohousing and case management for unaccompanied young adult refugees in Antwerp

The purpose of CURANT was to facilitate the integration of unaccompanied teenage and young adult refugees by means of two strategies: comprehensive individual coaching, and support from native young people with whom they cohabited. It was implemented in Antwerp (Belgium) from November 2016 to October 2019.


Fact Sheet
 

  • Original name: Cohousing and case management for unaccompanied young adult refugees in Antwer (CURANT).

  • Geographical scope: Antwerp (Belgium).

  • Promoting organisation: Antwerp City Council, heading a consortium of public bodies and NGOs.

  • Target groups: Unaccompanied teenage and young adult refugees.

  • Launch year: 2016.

  • End year: 2019.


www.antwerpen.be/nl/overzicht/cohousingcurant-1 

www.uia-initiative.eu/en/uia-cities/antwerp

1. Context

On turning 18, unaccompanied young adult refugees lose the state guardianship, the housing and the training programmes they had benefited from until then. However, often they continue to experience factors of vulnerability, such as traumas and lack of skills and of access to social networks, and have unrealistic expectations. They also have difficulties accessing housing, as do native young people.

2. Goals

The CURANT programme targeted, on the one hand, young people aged 17 to 21 with refugee status or subsidiary protection, who had arrived in Belgium without their family; and on the other, native young people aged 20 to 28. The aim was to facilitate the integration of the first group through comprehensive coaching and through cohabitation with people from the second group, who gave ongoing support to the first group. 
 

3. Intervention

The programme was based on an explicit theory of change (Mahieu and Ravn, 2017). Once the participants were selected, they were put into pairs and awarded one of the 25 available housing units, which were grouped into four different modes, where they were required to stay for 12 months, extendable to 18. Participation in the programme had economic incentives: the rent was affordable and the cohousing arrangement did not affect taxation or the social benefits applicable in other circumstances. 

In addition to housing, the following support was provided: 

  • The young adult refugees benefited from comprehensive individual coaching from a social worker who, following the case management model, offered not only training but also guidance with regard to community resources and psychological therapy. 

  • The native young adults received training to optimise cohabitation and strengthen their support task. 

The programme was funded by the European Regional Development Fund or ERDF (80%) and the organising consortium (20%). 

4. Results

Two mid-term evaluatio and one final evaluation were carried out, including interviews with technical staff and participants, together with observations and a survey (Mahieu, Van Raemdonck and Clycq, 2019).

A total of 81 young adult refugees and 77 natives took part in the programme. At the end of the programme, the first group’s Dutch language skills were either “better”or “a lot better” (76%), as was their confidence to speak it (82%), their understanding of the language (76%), their ability to find their way through the administration (82%), their wellbeing (84%), how often they use Dutch (85%), their social skills (67%), their understanding of local habits (67%), their knowledge of local society (67%) and the management of their finances (52%).

Classification

Tags

Subject areas

Related content

Article

Social stratification immigrants

How is social inequality distributed in Spain? The upper and middle classes account for 33%, the middle and lower-middle classes for 24%, and the low and very low classes for 43% of the population.

Article

Migration-related risk factors and psychological distress among unaccompanied migrant minors in Spain

How do factors subsequent to migration influence the psychological well-being of unaccompanied children?

Article

Preventing discrimination and social exclusion in Spain

In Spain, not all immigrant groups are perceived equally. According to this study, 35.9% of native Spaniards stated that they have positive contacts with Moroccans, while the figure increased to 59.8% in relation to people of Latin American origin.

Report

Evolution of wage gap between native-born and migrant youth in Spain

In what way does our background affect wages? This report analyses the evolution of wage trajectories among native and immigrant young people between 2007 and 2015.

Infodata

Demographic determinants

Population changes can occur due to variations in the population caused by natural changes and migratory movements.

You may also find interesting

Do financial incentives boost fertility in the long term?

Article

Do financial incentives boost fertility in the long term?


Social Inclusion

The cheque bebé was a payment designed to incentivise the birth rate, however its effect was limited. Although it helped some families to decide, difficulty in reconciling work and motherhood has continued to be the main obstacle to having more children.

Do family-friendly policies raise fertility?

Article

Do family-friendly policies raise fertility?


Social Inclusion

Work-life balance policies that strengthen job stability can contribute to increasing fertility by improving compatibility between work and motherhood, but they also pose challenges for female recruitment.

Households in transition in Spain and Portugal

Article

Households in transition in Spain and Portugal


Social Inclusion

Households in Spain and Portugal underwent significant change between 1991 and 2022. This report shows how the average household size has decreased, the number of single-person households has increased, and shared living structures have undergone transformation according to age and gender.